هام جداً : فرصة الأقباط التاريخية للرد على القرضاوى

[babylonian]

تابع ( 6 )

تقول :

لكن هل تعلم عن مؤرخ عاصر هذا الهيكل وكتب عنه؟؟
هل هناك مخطوطه قديمه باى لغه تقول ان هناك شىء اسمه الهيكل؟؟؟

نعم .. والمؤرخ هو ما ورد في الكتاب المقدس ومخطوطاته تملأ الدنيا ..
( هذا على اعتبار انه كتاريخ ) ..

ومن المؤرخين المعاصرين لخراب الهيكل هو المؤرخ الشهير يوسيفوس فلافيوس الذي واكب تلك الأحداث , وسجلها بتدقيق ..

ناهيك عن التاريخ الروماني الذي أرخ لحوادث خراب اورشليم وتدمير الهيكل الذي تم في سنة 70 ميلادية ..!
يعني اظن سيأتي يوم تطالبون فيه بالدليل على وجود الشمس !

اقرأ :

Siege
Despite early successes in repelling the Roman sieges, the Zealots fought amongst themselves, lacking proper leadership, discipline, training, and preparation for the battles that were to follow.
Titus surrounded the city, with three legions (V Macedonica, XII Fulminata, XV Apollinaris) on the western side and a fourth (X Fretensis) on the Mount of Olives to the east. He put pressure on the food and water supplies of the inhabitants by allowing pilgrims to enter the city to celebrate Passover, and then refusing them egress. After Jewish sallies killed a number of Roman soldiers, Titus sent Flavius Josephus, a former Jewish commander now loyal to Rome, to negotiate with the defenders; this ended with Jews wounding the negotiator with an arrow, and another sally was launched shortly after. Titus was almost captured during this sudden attack, but escaped.
In mid-May Titus set to destroying the newly built Third Wall with a ram, breaching it as well as the Second Wall, and turning their attention to the Fortress of Antonia just north of the Temple Mount. The Romans were then drawn into street fighting with the Zealots and sustained heavy enough losses that they were ordered to retreat. Josephus failed in another attempt at negotiations, and Jewish attacks prevented the construction of siege towers at the Fortress of Antonia. Food, water, and other provisions were dwindling, but small foraging parties managed to sneak supplies into the city, harrying Roman forces in the process. To put an end to the success of these foragers, orders were issued to build a new wall, and siege tower construction was restarted as well.
After several failed attempts to breach or scale the walls of the Fortress, the Romans finally launched a secret attack, overwhelming sleeping Zealot guards and taking the Fortress. This was the second highest ground in the city, after the Temple Mount, and provided a perfect point from which to attack the Temple itself. Battering rams made little progress, but the fighting itself eventually set the walls on , when a Roman soldier threw a burning stick onto one of the Temple's walls. Destroying the Temple was not among Titus' goals, possibly due in large part to the massive expansions done by Herod the Great mere decades earlier. Most likely, Titus had wanted to seize it and transform it into a pagan temple, dedicated to the Roman Emperor and to the Roman pantheon. But the flames spread quite quickly and were soon unquenchable. Even if the flames were manageable, the Roman soldiers wanted vengeance. The Temple was destroyed on Tisha B'Av, at the end of August, and as the flames spread into the residential sections of the city, along with the Roman legions, Jewish resistance crumbled quickly. Most of the remaining Jews escaped through hidden underground tunnels. Some Jews made a final stand in the Upper City. This defence halted the Roman advance as they had to construct siege towers just to assail the remaining Jews. The city was completely under Roman control by the September 7 and most of the remaining Jews that had fled Jerusalem, were hunted down and massacred.
The destruction of the Temple is still mourned annually as the Jewish fast Tisha B'Av, and the Arch of Titus, depicting and celebrating the sack of Jerusalem and the Temple, still stands in Rome.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destruction_of_Jerusalem





واقرأ عن الملك تيطس الروماني الذي دمر الهيكل !




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Emperor_Titus

تقول :

, فهل مع البحث والتنقيب على مدار اكثر من 110 سنوات منذ عام 1890 وجد اليهود اى شىء يثبت وجود هذا الهيكل؟؟

اخبرتك يا عزيزي ماهر ..
حتى لو لم يجدوا ذرة رمل واحدة من بناء الهيكل , فهذا لا يعني عدم تواجده تاريخياً ..

ومع ذلك .. فهذا احد الاثارات التي اكتشفت حوله جبل الهيكل ..

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ting_place.jpg

هل هناك اى مخطوطه باى لغه تم الاشاره فيها الى وجود هيكل؟؟

نعم .. الكتاب المقدس !
واقوال كبار علماءك ومفسري القرآن ..!
اضافة الى التاريخ الروماني .. والعالمي !
والمؤرخون الذين عاصروا احداث خراب اورشليم والهيكل ..



تابع ...